Our summary
An AI answer can fit the allowed format and still be wrong. BoundLayer's team explains how Jev can choose a route, give a rating or estimate whether a statement is true, without writing a reply. Its proposed design keeps those judgments separate from exact calculations, permission checks and actions such as paying an invoice.
The application gathers only needed evidence, asks specific questions and uses code to decide what happens next. Uncertain answers may go to a person, another check or a deferred action. Record the versions of the questions, answer options, evidence-building steps and action rules together, so changes can be traced and tested.
Compare the design with existing rules or other models on real workflow examples, including missing evidence and costly mistakes. Measure how much work wrong answers create later, not only response speed. The team recommends watching decisions before letting them change outcomes. This is a proposed architecture from a services firm, not a demonstrated production result.
Key takeaways
- Give each question one job and allow an uncertain or other answer. A choice between two unsuitable options still forces a bad decision.
- Keep permissions, money calculations and required approvals in ordinary code. A high probability is not authority to send a message or release funds.
- Test and record the whole setup, including fallback behavior and action thresholds. Recheck it when the model, evidence, questions or policy change.