Our summary
A coding assistant may shorten a long conversation into a summary so it can continue working. This experimental Codex add-on first asks which old tool calls and results should be kept exactly. It adds that saved evidence beside Codex's normal summary rather than replacing the summary.
The add-on pairs tool calls with results and protects the first and newest messages. Separate Jev questions assess older pairs, while decisions and retained text are saved locally. Missing keys, failed requests, oversized information, or too little expected reduction leave Codex's normal process unchanged.
The maintainer explicitly advises against relying on this for real work. A high keep-or-drop score does not prove evidence is safe to lose. Retained text has a size limit, history formats may change, and rewriting conversation history can interfere with reuse of earlier processing.
Key takeaways
- Keep recent messages and retained evidence exact.
- Leave normal summarization unchanged when the extra step cannot run safely.
- Treat this as an experiment, not a proven improvement.