JevMade Sign in
← Back to guides

JevMade field notes / Calibration audit guide

How to test if an AI assistant's confidence matches its accuracy

You will learn how to measure if an AI assistant's confidence scores are reliable. The guide explains how to use past records to find the best balance between automated decisions and human review.

Original by hopeEvaluation

Listen to this guide

JevMade’s plain-English explanation

0:00 /

Our summary

This guide explains a tool that checks if an AI assistant is actually correct when it claims to be confident. People use it to decide when software can handle a task automatically and when a human needs to step in to prevent costly mistakes.

The software looks at past decisions where a person eventually provided the correct answer. It compares the machine's stated confidence against its actual success rate. It groups these records to find hidden errors and calculates the best cutoff point to balance human review time against error costs.

This tool is useful for teams managing automated decisions, but it requires existing records of correct answers to measure anything. The cost savings shown in the guide are explanatory examples created for testing, not actual results from a live business deployment.

Key takeaways

  1. Compare the software's stated certainty with its actual success rate using past records.
  2. Check specific groups of tasks separately, because overall success rates can hide dangerous mistakes in one area.
  3. Choose automation cutoffs by balancing the cost of mistakes against the expense of human review.

The money and cost-saving examples in the guide are synthetic scenarios used for explanation. They do not represent actual results from a live deployment.

GitHub repository

Read the original guide Opens the author’s site in a new tab.

Keep this for later

Sign in to bookmark experiments, guides and videos, and keep notes only you can see.

Continue to sign in

We’ll bring you back to this listing.