JevMade Sign in
← Back to guides

JevMade field notes / Written guide

Give coding agents focused quality evidence

Supercov combines an existing test command with named code-quality and security questions. It turns uncovered paths and scored source files into small findings that a coding agent can inspect, test, or refactor, rather than asking the agent to improve an entire codebase without a measurable target.

Original by SupercorpEvaluation

Listen to this guide

JevMade’s plain-English explanation

0:00 /

Our summary

Supercov gives a coding agent one inspectable target at a time. Coverage is a record of which code lines tests ran, while an assertion is an exact expected result. The tool combines that evidence with named quality questions instead of requesting a broad rewrite.

An agent chooses one finding, makes a focused test or refactor—a change to code structure without an intended behavior change—and reruns the normal test command. Saved evidence shows what ran and what changed before another target is selected.

Coverage does not prove behavior is correct, and a model score does not prove a defect. Quality scoring sends source code to an outside service. Language support and excluded files vary, so teams need their own security review and must inspect gaps.

Key takeaways

  1. Give an assistant one inspectable finding at a time.
  2. Rerun the project's normal tests after each change.
  3. Neither test coverage nor a model score proves correctness.

The guide reflects the project's documented workflow.

GitHub project documentation

Read the original guide Opens the author’s site in a new tab.

Keep this for later

Sign in to bookmark experiments, guides and videos, and keep notes only you can see.

Continue to sign in

We’ll bring you back to this listing.