JevMade hello@JevMade.com
← Back to guides

JevMade field notes / Evaluation notebook

Self-consistency: choices

Runs repeated moderation Choices on a borderline post, adds an uncertain outcome, and compares label agreement with the share of cases that can be acted on automatically.

Original by TypeSafe AIEvaluationTypeSafe cookbookSource reviewed

Before you dive in

What you’ll find in the original

  1. Keep repeated samples independent and compare label distributions, not just one answer.
  2. Treat abstention as a product trade-off: fewer automatic actions can improve agreement.
  3. Read the cached samples and experimental conditions before interpreting speed or cost plots.
Worth knowing

Agreement between repeated judgments does not establish correctness against human labels.