JevMade Sign in
← Back to videos

JevMade field notes / Video guide

You Can Learn Jev VS LLM In 22 Min | System 1 vs System 2, AGI, Eval

Sean Chen explains TypeSafe AI's Jev decision model, contrasting its System 1 fast JSON architecture with conversational LLMs. He walks through Noul, choice, and score questions in the playground, then evaluates accuracy, latency, and cost across custom agent benchmarks.

Original by Sean‘s AI StoriesEvaluationIntermediate22 min 29 sec Published

Before you press play

What you’ll find in the video

  1. Jev operates as a System 1 decision engine taking JSON state and questions, returning probability distributions without conversational text.
  2. Jev supports three distinct decision types: Noul (boolean binary classification), choice (categorical selection from mutually exclusive options), and score (progressive ordinal expected value calculation).
  3. In the creator's dashboard benchmark across 15 questions per category, Jev showed lower latency and cost than Opus or Haiku, but exhibited lower accuracy on complex scoring tasks.
Worth knowing

The benchmark was conducted on a small sample of 15 custom, human-labeled questions across five narrow categories rather than an extensive, controlled industry benchmark.

You Can Learn Jev VS LLM In 22 Min | System 1 vs System 2, AGI, Eval

Keep this for later

Sign in to bookmark experiments, guides and videos, and keep notes only you can see.

Continue to sign in

We’ll bring you back to this listing.