What it does
The author missed the target: finding 95% of included studies took reading 62% of the list. The rules were written with knowledge of this dataset, not tested on an unseen review.
Benchmarks & research
Jev Abstract Screener
A paper-screening experiment ranks research abstracts with Jev, then checks how many relevant studies a shorter reading list would miss.
Bookmark: Jev Abstract Screener
Keep this in your collection.
Leave a noteWhat would you try with this?
: Jev Abstract Screener
Only you can see your notes.
Screenshot unavailable. Open the experiment ↗
How you can use it
You can borrow this study’s way of testing a shorter reading list. Start with papers that researchers have already judged. Ask Jev, an AI service, to put likely matches first. Compare its order with a simple word search.
Then count how many wanted papers each list misses as you read down it. That shows the cost of reading fewer papers. This study cannot tell you when it is safe to stop reading a new list.