What it does
It adapts NiazMorshed2007’s review rubric. Complete text diffs go to TypeSafe; oversized or binary-only changes fail without a partial review, and scores do not prove correctness.
Integrations
Jev PR Quality
Review pull requests with Jev and compare their quality ratings across repositories in a RawTree dashboard.
Bookmark: Jev PR Quality
Keep this in your collection.
Leave a noteWhat would you try with this?
: Jev PR Quality
Only you can see your notes.
Screenshot unavailable. Open the experiment ↗
How you can use it
A developer can add the example GitHub workflow to review proposed code changes. Jev rates the complete text change, and the workflow can stop when a relevant rating is too low. Keep normal tests and human review: these ratings are AI judgments, not proof that the code works.
To compare reviews over time, connect the workflow to RawTree with a write-only access key. Dashboard viewers use separate read-only keys. Check your sharing rules first: TypeSafe receives the code changes and review context, while RawTree stores ratings and details identifying the repository, author and proposed change.