What it does
Jev never sees the investigator's answer and does not change the fraud score. Disagreement sends the case to review, while failures leave the original report intact.
Apps & data pipelines
Adds an optional second opinion to fraud investigations, comparing Jev's action and grounding check with the existing evidence pipeline.
Only you can see your notes.
Screenshot unavailable. Open the experiment ↗
Jev never sees the investigator's answer and does not change the fraud score. Disagreement sends the case to review, while failures leave the original report intact.
Before touching any code, outline the specific fraud signs your team reviews on suspicious transactions. Have a developer supply an access key from TypeSafe and turn on the verification setting. The prototype then analyzes transaction records and drafts an explanation for human review.
This extra step acts as an optional audit pass. It checks whether the drafted explanation actually matches the gathered payment evidence. It never changes the final fraud risk score or blocks reports if the check fails, leaving final decisions to your investigators.